# A glimpse into the shadowy realm of a Chinese APT: detailed analysis of a ShadowPad intrusion **[research.nccgroup.com/2022/09/30/a-glimpse-into-the-shadowy-realm-of-a-chinese-apt-detailed-analysis-of-a-shadowpad-intrusion/](https://research.nccgroup.com/2022/09/30/a-glimpse-into-the-shadowy-realm-of-a-chinese-apt-detailed-analysis-of-a-shadowpad-intrusion/)** Authors: William Backhouse [(@Will0x04), Michael Mullen (@DropTheBase64) and Nikolaos Pantazopoulos](https://twitter.com/Will0x04) ## Summary tl;dr September 30, 2022 This post explores some of the TTPs employed by a threat actor who was observed deploying ShadowPad during an incident response engagement. Below provides a summary of findings which are presented in this blog post: Initial access via CVE-2022-29464. Successive backdoors installed – PoisonIvy, a previously undocumented backdoor and finally ShadowPad. Establishing persistence via Windows Services to execute legitimate binaries which sideloads backdoors, including ShadowPad. Use of information gathering tools such as ADFind and PowerView. Lateral movement leveraging RDP and ShadowPad. Use of 7zip for data collection. ShadowPad used for Command and Control. Exfiltration of data. ## ShadowPad This blog looks to build on the work of other security research done by SecureWorks and PwC with firsthand experience of TTPs used in a recent incident where ShadowPad was deployed. ShadowPad is a modular remote access trojan (RAT) which is thought to be used almost exclusively by China-Based threat actors. ## Attribution Based on the findings of our Incident Response investigation, NCC Group assesses with high confidence that the threat actor detailed in this article was a China-based Advanced Persistent Threat (APT). This is based on the following factors ----- ShadowPad Public reporting has previously indicated the distribution of ShadowPad is tightly controlled and is typically exclusive to China-based threat actors for use during espionage campaigns. TTPs – Specific TTPs observed during the attack were found to match those previously observed by China-based threat actors, both within NCC Group incident response engagements and the wider security community. Activity pattern analysis – The threat actor was typically active during the hours of 01:00 – 09:00 (UTC) which matches the working hours of China ## TTPs Initial Access A recent vulnerability in WSO2, CVE-2022-29464 [3], was the root cause of the incident. The actor, amongst other attackers, was able to exploit the vulnerability soon after it was published to create web shells on a server. The actor leveraged a web shell to load a backdoor, in this case PoisonIvy. This was deployed via a malicious DLL and leveraged DLL Search Order Hijacking, a tactic which was continuously leveraged throughout the attack. ## Execution Certutil.exe was used via commands issued on web shells to install the PoisonIvy backdoor on patient zero. The threat actor leveraged command prompt and PowerShell throughout the incident. Additionally, several folders named _MEI were observed within the Windows\Temp folder. The digits in the folder name change each time a binary is compiled. These folders are created on a host when a python executable is compiled. Within these folders were the .pyd library files and DLL files. The created time for these folders matched the last modified time stamp of the complied binary within the shimcache. ## Persistence Run Keys and Windows services were used throughout in order to ensure the backdoors deployed obtained persistence. ## Defense Evasion The threat actor undertook significant anti-forensic actions on ShadowPad related files to evade detection. This included timestomping the malicious DLL and applying the NTFS attributes of hidden and system to the files. Legitimate but renamed Windows binaries were used to load the configuration file. The threat actor also leveraged a legitimate Windows DLL, `secur32.dll, as the name of the configuration file` for the ShadowPad backdoor. All indicators of compromise, aside from backdoor modules and loaders, were removed from the hosts by the threat actor. ## Credential Access The threat actor was observed collecting all web browser credentials from all hosts across the environment. It is unclear at this stage how this was achieved with the evidence available. ## Discovery A vast array of tooling was used to scan and enumerate the network as the actor negotiated their way through it, these included but were not limited to the following: AdFind NbtScan PowerView PowerShell scripts to enumerate hosts on port 445 Tree.exe ## Lateral Movement Lateral movement was largely carried out using Windows services, particularly leveraging SMB pipes. The only interactive sessions observed were onward RDP sessions to customer connected sites. ## Collection ----- In addition to the automated collection of harvested credentials, the ShadowPad keylogger module was used in the attack, storing the keystrokes in encrypted database files for exfiltration. The output of which was likely included in archive files created by the attacker, along with the output of network scanning and reconnaissance. ## Command and Control In total, three separate command and control infrastructures were identified, all of which utilised DLL search order hijacking / DLL side loading. The initial payload was PoisonIvy, this was only observed on patient zero. The threat actor went on to deploy a previously undocumented backdoor once they gained an initial foothold in the network, this framework established persistence via a service called K7AVWScn, masquerading as an older anti-virus product. Finally, once a firm foothold was established within the network the threat actor deployed ShadowPad. Notably, the ShadowPad module for the proxy feature was also observed during the attack to proxy C2 communications via a less conspicuous server. ## Exfiltration Due to the exfiltration capabilities of ShadowPad, it is highly likely to have been the method of exfiltration to steal data from the customer network. This is further cemented by a small, yet noticeable spike in network traffic to threat actor controlled infrastructure. ## Recommendations Searches for the documented IOCs should be conducted If IOCs are identified a full incident response investigation should be conducted ## ShadowPad Technical Analysis Initialisation phase Upon execution, the ShadowPad core module enters an initialisation phase at which it decrypts its configuration and determines which mode it runs. In summary, we identified the following modes: **Mode** **ID** **Description** 3 Injects itself to a specified process (specified in the ShadowPad configuration) and adds persistence to the compromised host. In addition, if the compromised user belongs to a group with a SID starting with S-1-5-80- then the specified target process uses the token of ‘lsass’. 4 Injects itself to a specified process (specified in the ShadowPad configuration) and executes the core code in a new thread. In addition, if the compromised user belongs to a group with a SID starting with S-1-5-80 then the specified target process uses the token of ‘lsass’. 5 Injects itself to a specified process (specified in the ShadowPad configuration). In addition, if the compromised user belongs to a group with a SID starting with S-1-5-80 then the specified target process uses the token of ‘lsass’. 16 Injects itself to a specified process (specified in the ShadowPad configuration) and creates/starts a new service (details are specified in the ShadowPad configuration), which executes the core code. In addition, if the compromised user belongs to a group with a SID starting with S-1-5-80 then the specified target process uses the token of ‘lsass’. _Table 1 – ShadowPad Modes_ _ANALYST NOTE: The shellcode is decrypted using a combination of bitwise XOR operations._ Configuration storage and structure ShadowPad comes with an embedded encrypted configuration, which it locates by scanning its own shellcode (core module) with the following method (Python representation): ----- ``` first_value = data[dword :dword+4] second_value = data[dword+4:dword+8] third_value = data[dword+8:dword+12] fourth_value = data[dword+12:dword+16] fifth_value = data[dword+16:dword+20] sixth_value = data[dword+20:dword+24] xor1 = int.from_bytes(second_value,'little') ^ 0x8C4832F1 xor2 = int.from_bytes(fourth_value,'little') ^ 0xC3BF9669 xor3 = int.from_bytes(sixth_value,'little') ^ 0x9C2891BA if xor1 == int.from_bytes(first_value,'little') and xor2 == int.from_bytes(third_value,'little') and xor3 == int.from_bytes(fifth_value,'little'): print(f"found: {dword:02x}") encrypted = data[dword:] break ``` After locating it successfully, it starts searching in it for a specified byte that represents the type of data (e.g., 0x02 represents an embedded module). In total, we have identified the following types: **ID** **Description** 0x02 Embedded ShadowPad module. 0x80 ShadowPad configuration. It should start with the DWORD value 0x9C9D22EC. 0x90 XOR key used during the generation of unique names (e.g., registry key name) 0x91 DLL loader file data. 0x92 DLL loader file to load. File might have random appended data (Depends on the config’s flag at offset 0x326). 0xA0 Loader’s filepath _Table 2 – Shadowpad Data Types_ Once one of the above bytes are located, ShadowPad reads the data (size is defined before the byte identifier) and appends the last DWORD value to the hardcoded byte array ‘1A9115B2D21384C6DA3C21FCCA5201A4’. Then it hashes (MD5) the constructed byte array and derives an AES-CBC 128bits key and decrypts the data. In addition, ShadowPad stores, in an encrypted format, the following data in the registry with the registry key name being unique (based on volume serial number of C:\) for each compromised host: 1. ShadowPad configuration (0x80) data. 2. Proxy configuration. Includes proxy information that ShadowPad requires. These are the network communication protocol, domain/IP proxy and the proxy port. 3. Downloaded modules. ShadowPad Network Servers ShadowPad starts two TCP/UDP servers at 0.0.0.0. The port(s) is/are specified in the ShadowPad configuration. These servers work as a proxy between other compromised hosts in the network. In addition, ShadowPads starts a raw socket server, which receives data and does one of the following tasks (depending on the received data): 1. Updates and sets proxy configuration to SOCKS4 mode. 2. Updates and sets proxy configuration to SOCKS5 mode. 3. Updates and sets proxy configuration to HTTP mode. Network Communication ShadowPad supports a variety of network protocols (supported by dedicated modules). For all of them, ShadowPad uses the same procedure to store and encrypt network data. The procedure’s steps are: 1. Compress the network data using the QuickLZ library module. 2. Generates a random DWORD value, which is appended to the byte array ‘1A9115B2D21384C6DA3C21FCCA5201A4’. Then, the constructed byte array is hashed (MD5) and an AES-CBC 128bits key is derived (CryptDeriveKey). ----- 3. The data is then encrypted using the generated AES key. In addition, Shadowpad encrypts the following data fields using bitwise XOR operations: 1. Command/Module ID: Command/Module ID ^ ( 0x1FFFFF * Hashing_Key – 0x2C7BEECE ) 2. Data_Size: Data_Size ^ ( 0x1FFFFFF * 0x7FFFFF * ( 0x1FFFFF * Hashing_Key – 0x2C7BEECE ) – 0x536C9757 – 0x7C06303F ) 3. Command_Execution_State: Command_Execution_State ^ 0x7FFFFF * (0x1FFFFF * Hashing_Key – 0x2C7BEECE) – 0x536C9757 As a last step, ShadowPad encapsulates the above generated data into the following structure: ``` struct Network_Packet { DWORD Hashing_Key; DWORD Command_ID_Module_ID; DWORD Command_Execution_State; //Usually contains any error codes. DWORD Data_Size; byte data[Data_Size]; }; ``` If any server responds, it should have the same format as above. Network Commands and Modules During our analysis, we managed to extract a variety of ShadowPad modules with most of them having their own set of network commands. The table below summarises the identified commands of the modules, which we managed to recover. **Module** **Command ID** **Description** Main module 0xC49D0031 First command sent to the C2 if the commands fetcher function does not run in a dedicated thread. Main module 0xC49D0032 First command sent to the C2 if the commands fetcher function does run in a dedicated thread. Main module 0xC49D0033 Fingerprints the compromised host and sends the information to the C2. Main module 0xC49D0032 (Received) Executes the network command fetcher function in a thread. Main module 0xC49D0034 Sents an empty reply to the C2. Main module 0xC49D0037 Echoes the server’s reply. Main module 0xC49D0039 Sends number of times the Shadowpad files were detected to be deleted. Main module 0xC49D0016 Deletes Shadowpad registry keys. Main module 0xC49D0035 Enters sleep mode for 3 seconds in total. Main module 0xC49D0036 Enters sleep mode for 5 seconds in total. Main module 0xC49D0010 Retrieves Shadowpad execution information. Main module 0xC49D0012 Updates Shadowpad configuration (in registry). Main module 0xC49D0014 Deletes Shadowpad module from registry. Main module 0xC49D0015 Unloads a Shadowpad module. Main module 0xC49D0020 Retrieves Shadowpad current configuration (from registry). Main module 0xC49D0021 Updates the Shadowpad configuration in registry and (re)starts the TCP/UDP servers. Main module 0xC49D0022 Deletes Shadowpad registry entries and starts the TCP/UDP servers. Main module 0xC49D0050 Retrieves Shadowpad proxy configuration from registry. Main module 0xC49D0051 Updates Shadowpad proxy configuration. Main module 0xC49D0052 Updates Shadowpad proxy configuration by index. Main module 0xC49D0053 Sets Shadowpad proxy configuration bytes to 0 Main module Any Module ID Loads and initialises the specified module ID. Files manager module 0x67520006 File operations (copy,delete,move,rename). ----- Files manager module 0x67520007 Executes a file. Files manager module 0x67520008 Uploads/Downloads file to/from C2. Files manager module 0x6752000A Searches for a specified file. Files manager module 0x6752000C Downloads a file from a specified URL. Files manager module 0x67520005 Timestomp a file. Files manager module 0x67520000 Get logical drives information. Files manager module 0x67520001 Searches recursively for a file. Files manager module 0x67520002 Checks if file/directory is writable. Files manager module 0x67520003 Creates a directory. Files manager module 0x67520004 Gets files list in a given directory TCP/UDP module 0x54BD0000 Loads TCP module and proxy data via it. TCP/UDP module 0x54BD0001 Proxies UDP network data. Desktop module 0x62D50000 Enumerates monitors. Desktop module 0x62D50001 Takes desktop screenshot. Desktop module 0x62D50002 Captures monitor screen. Desktop module 0x62D50010 Gets desktop module local database file path. Desktop module 0x62D50011 Reads and sends the contents of local database file to the C2. Desktop module 0x62D50012 Writes to local database file and starts a thread that constantly takes desktop screenshots. Processes manager module Processes manager module Network Connections module Network Connections module 0x70D0000 Gets processes list along with their information 0x70D0001 Terminates a specified process 0x6D0000 Gets TCP network table. 0x6D0001 Gets UDP network table. PIPEs module 0x23220000 Reads/Writes data to PIPEs. Propagation module 0x2C120010 Get module’s configuration. Propagation module 0x2C120011 Transfer network data between C2 and PIPEs. Propagation module 0x2C120012 Constant transfer of network data between C2 and PIPEs. Propagation module 0x2C120013 Transfer network data between C2 and PIPEs. Propagation module 0x2C120014 Constant transfer of network data between C2 and PIPEs. Propagation module 0x2C120015 Transfer network data between C2 and PIPEs. Propagation module 0x2C120016 Constant transfer of network data between C2 and PIPEs. Propagation module 0x2C120017 Transfer network data between C2 and PIPEs. Propagation module 0x2C120018 Transfer network data between C2 and PIPEs. Scheduled tasks module 0x71CD0000 Gets a list of the scheduled tasks. Scheduled tasks module 0x71CD0001 Gets information of a specified scheduled task. Wi-Fi stealer module 0xDC320000 Collects credentials/information of available Wi-Fi devices. Network discovery module 0xF36A0000 Collects MAC addresses. ----- Network discovery module Network discovery module 0xF36A0001 Collects IP addresses information. 0xF36A0003 Port scanning. Console module 0x329A0000 Starts a console mode in the compromised host. Keylogger module 0x63CA0000 Reads the keylogger file and sends its content to the C2. Keylogger module 0x63CA0001 Deletes keylogger file. _Table 3 – Modules Network Commands_ Below are listed the available modules, which do not have network commands (Table 3). **Module ID** **Description** E8B5 QUICKLZ library module. 7D82 Sockets connection module (supports SOCKS4, SOCKS5 and HTTP). C7BA TCP module. _Table 4 – Available modules without network commands_ Below are listed the modules that we identified after analysing the main module of ShadowPad but were not recovered. **Module ID** **Description** 0x25B2 UDP network module. 0x1FE2 HTTP network module. 0x9C8A HTTPS network module. 0x92CA ICMP network module 0x64EA Unknown _Table 5 – Non-Recovered ShadowPad Modules_ Misc 1. ShadowPad uses a checksum method to compare certain values (e.g., if it runs under certain access rights). This method has been implemented below in Python: ``` ror = lambda val, r_bits, max_bits: \ ((val & (2**max_bits-1)) >> r_bits%max_bits) | \ (val << (max_bits-(r_bits%max_bits)) & (2**max_bits-1)) rounds = 0x80 data = b"" output = 0xB69F4F21 max_bits = 32 counter = 0 for i in range( len(data) ): data_character = data[counter] if (data_character - 97)&0xff <= 0x19: data_character &= ~0x20&0xfffffff counter +=1 output = (data_character + ror(output, 8,32)) ^ 0xF90393D1 print ( hex( output )) ``` Under certain modes, ShadowPad chooses to download and inject a payload from its command-and-control server. ShadowPad parses its command-and-control server domain/IP address and sends a HTTP request. The reply is expected to be a payload, which ShadowPad injects into another process. _ANALYST NOTE: In case the IP address/Domain includes the character ‘@’,_ _ShadowPad decrypts it with a custom_ _algorithm._ ## Indicators of Compromise ----- IOC Indicator Type C:\wso2is-4.6.0\BVRPDiag.exe File Path C:\wso2is-4.6.0\BVRPDiag.tsi File Path C:\wso2is-4.6.0\BVRPDiag.dll File Path C:\wso2is-4.6.0\ModemMOH.dll File Path C:\Windows\System32\spool\drivers\color\K7AVWScn.dll File Path C:\Windows\System32\spool\drivers\color\K7AVWScn.doc File Path C:\Windows\System32\spool\drivers\color\K7AVWScn.exe File Path C:\Windows\System32\spool\drivers\color\secur32.dll File Path C:\Windows\System32\spool\drivers\color\secur32.dll.dat File Path C:\Windows\System32\spool\drivers\color\WindowsUpdate.exe File Path C:\Windows\Temp\WinLog\secur32.dll File Path C:\Windows\Temp\WinLog\secur32.dll.dat File Path C:\Windows\Temp\WinLog\WindowsEvents.exe File Path C:\ProgramData\7z.dll File Path C:\ProgramData\7z.exe File Path C:\Users\Public\AdFind.exe File Path C:\Users\Public\nbtscan.exe File Path C:\Users\Public\start.bat File Path Description Legitimate executable to sideload PoisonIvy PoisonIvy Previously undocumented C2 framework Unknown file in the same location as PosionIvy Legitimate executable to sideload PoisonIvy ShadowPad DLL ShadowPad Encrypted Configuration Legitimate executable to sideload ShadowPad ShadowPad DLL ShadowPad Encrypted Configuration Legitimate executable to sideload ShadowPad Archiving tool Archiving tool Reconnaissance tooling Reconnaissance tooling Unknown batch script, suspected to start execution of mimikatz ----- C:\Users\Public\t\64.exe File Path C:\Users\Public\t\7z.exe File Path C:\Users\public\t\browser.exe File Path C:\Users\Public\t\nircmd.exe File Path C:\users\public\t\test.bat File Path C:\Users\Public\test.bat File Path C:\Users\Public\test.exe File Path C:\Users\Public\test\Active Directory\ntds.dit File Path C:\Users\Public\test\registry\SECURITY File Path C:\Users\Public\test\registry\SYSTEM File Path C:\Users\Public\WebBrowserPassView.exe File Path C:\Windows\debug\adprep\P.bat File Path C:\Windows\system32\spool\drivers\affair.exe File Path C:\Windows\System32\spool\drivers\color\SessionGopher.ps1 File Path C:\windows\system32\spool\drivers\color\tt.bat File Path C:\Windows\Temp\best.exe File Path ip445.ps1 File Name Unknown executable, suspected mimikatz Archiving tool Unknown attacker executable NirCmd is a small commandline utility that allows you to do some useful tasks without displaying any user interface. Unknown attacker batch script Unknown attacker batch script Unknown attacker executable Staging location for NTDS dump Staging location for registry dump Staging location for registry dump NirSoft tool for recovering credentials from web browsers. Unknown attacker batch script Unknown attacker executable Decrypts saved session information for remote access tools. Unknown attacker batch script Tree.exe Unknown PowerShell script suspected to be related to network reconnaissance ----- ip445.txt File Name nbtscan.exe File Name SOFTWARE: Classes\CLSID\*\42BF3891 Registry Key SOFTWARE: Classes\CLSID\*\45E6A5BE Registry Key SOFTWARE: Classes\CLSID\*\840EE6F6 Registry Key SOFTWARE: Classes\CLSID\*\9003BDD0 Registry Key Software:Classes\CLSID\*\51E27247 Registry Key Software\Microsoft\*\*\009F24BCCEA54128C2344E03CEE577E12504DD569C8B48AB8B7EAD5249778643 Registry Key Software\Microsoft\*\*\5F336A90564002BE360DF63106AA7A7568829C6C084E793D6DC93A896C476204 Registry Key Software\Microsoft\*\*\FF98EFB4C7680726BF336CEC477777BB3BEB73C7BAA1A5A574C39E7F4E804585 Registry Key D1D0E39004FA8138E2F2C4157FA3B44B MD5 Hash 54B419C2CAC1A08605936E016D460697 MD5 Hash B426C17B99F282C13593954568D86863 MD5 Hash 7504DEA93DB3B8417F16145E8272BA08 MD5 Hash D99B22020490ECC6F0237EFB2C3DEF27 MD5 Hash 1E6E936A0A862F18895BC7DD6F607EB4 MD5 Hash A6A19804248E9CC5D7DE5AEA86590C63 MD5 Hash 4BFE4975CEAA15ED0031941A390FAB55 MD5 Hash 87F9D1DE3E549469F918778BD637666D MD5 Hash 8E9F8E8AB0BEF7838F2A5164CF7737E4 MD5 Hash ## Mitre Att&ck Tactic Technique ID Description Suspected output file for ip445.ps1 Attacker tooling Encrypted ShadowPad configuration Encrypted ShadowPad configuration Encrypted ShadowPad configuration Encrypted ShadowPad configuration Encrypted ShadowPad configuration Encrypted ShadowPad module Encrypted ShadowPad module Encrypted ShadowPad module PoisenIvy DLL Undocumented backdoor DLL Undocumented backdoor related file ShadowPad DLL ShadowPad DLL ShadowPad DLL ShadowPad DLL ShadowPad DLL ShadowPad DLL ShadowPad DLL ----- Initial Access Exploit Public-Facing Applications Execution Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell Execution Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell Execution Command and Scripting Interpreter: Python Execution Scheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task Execution Exploitation for Client Execution Execution Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) Persistence Boot or Logon Autostart Execution: Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder Persistence Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service Privilege Escalation Defence Evasion Defence Evasion Defence Evasion Defence Evasion Defence Evasion Defence Evasion Defence Evasion Defence Evasion Defence Evasion Valid Accounts: Domain Accounts Impair Defenses: Downgrade Attack Indicator Removal on Host: File Deletion Indicator Removal on Host: Timestomp Obfuscated Files or Information Masquerading: Rename System Utilities Process Injection: Process Hollowing Hide Artefacts: Hidden Files and Directories Hijack Execution Flow: DLL Search Order Hijacking T1190 Initial access was gained via the threat actor exploiting CVE-2022-29464 to create a web shell T1059:001 PowerShell based tools PowerView and SessionGopher were executed across the estate for reconnaissance and credential harvesting. Additionally, hands on keyboard commands were identified as being executed to confirm which version of the malware was present. T1059:003 A scheduled task used by the threat actor was used to launch a Windows Command Shell. The purpose is not known. T1059:006 Several compiled python binaries were identified. It is likely the binaries related to the creation of an FTP server. T1053 A scheduled task named “update” was observed and configured to execute a command prompt on multiple hosts throughout the environment. Upon successful execution of the task the threat actor then deleted the task from the host T1203 The threat actor leveraged CVE-2022-29464 to deploy web shells and allow remote command execution on patient zero. T1047 WMI was used by the threat actor to carry out reconnaissance activity. T1547.001 A run key for the local administrator was created to execute the malicious backdoor. T1543.003 Two malicious services were deployed widely across the estate for persistence of the backdoors. Both services execute a legitimate binary which is stored in the same location as a malicious DLL, when executed the legitimate binary would side load the malicious DLL containing the backdoor. T1078.002 The threat actor was primarily using domain administrator credentials to move laterally throughout the attack, allowing them to blend in with legitimate administrator activity. T1562.010 The threat actor was observed utilising PowerShell downgrades, this is typically used by threat actors to avoid the script logging capabilities of PowerShell version 5+ T1070.004 The threat actor routinely removed the majority of tooling deployed throughout the attack from hosts upon completion of their objectives. T1070.006 The threat actor timestomped all files relating to the backdoors including the legitimate binary and the malicious DLL. Modify Registry T1112 The modules for ShadowPad were stored within the registry in an encrypted format. The keys for the stored data are generated depending on the volume serial number of the host. T1027 The ShadowPad configuration was stored within an encrypted registry hive. The keylogger module of ShadowPad created an encrypted output file on the host. T1036.003 The threat actor leveraged a legitimate Windows DLL, secur32.dll, as the name of the configuration file for the ShadowPad backdoor. T1055.012 Upon execution ShadowPad spawns a sacrificial process, which then utilises the technique of process hollowing to inject into the process. T1564.001 Several malicious files were identified as having the NTFS attribute of hidden. T1574.001 The backdoors leveraged DLL Search Order Hijacking. ----- Credential Access Credential Access Credential Access Credential Access Credential Access Credential Access Credentials from Password Stores: Credentials from Web Browsers Credentials from Password Stores: Windows Credential Manager OS Credential Dumping: LSASS Memory OS Credential Dumping: NTDS Unsecured Credentials: Credentials in Files Input Capture: Keylogging T1555:003 The NirSoft tool WebBrowserPassView.exe was also identified as being executed by the attacker. T1555.004 Credential harvesting which indicated credentials from Windows Credential Manager were collected was identified on a domain controller. T1003.001 ProcDump.exe was leveraged on patient zero during the attack in order to dump credentials stored in the process memory of Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS). T1003.003 The NTDS.dit was dumped and exfiltrated from a domain controller for each domain. T1552.001 Several instances of passwords in plaintext files were observed on hosts where ShadowPad was installed/ T1056:001 ShadowPad instances had a Keylogger module installed. T1083 Tree.exe was used to enumerate files and directories on compromised hosts. T1135 A PowerShell script named ip445.ps1 was used throughout the attack to enumerate network shares across the Windows estate. T016 AdFind.exe can extract subnet information from Active Directory. T1087.002 AdFind.exe can enumerate domain users. T1482 AdFind.exe can gather information about organizational units (OUs) and domain trusts from Active Directory. T1069 AdFind.exe can enumerate domain groups. T1018 AdFind.exe has the ability to query Active Directory for computers. T1021.001 RDP was used by the threat actor to laterally move. It is unknown whether this was a deliberate act to move estates or if the threat actor was attempting to move to another domain. T1021.002 The Powerview module of Powersploit was used to enumerate all SMB shares across the environment. T1021.006 WinRM was used by the actor during periods of network reconnaissance. T1021.003 Anti-virus alerts showed the threat actor as utilising WMI to laterally move to hosts across the network. T1119 Large scale credential harvesting was conducted against remote hosts from a domain controller. T1074.002 Credentials harvested by the threat actor were collected on a domain controller, prior to exfiltration. T1056.001 ShadowPad instances had a Keylogger module installed which allowed them to capture the input of interactive sessions. The output was stored on disk in encrypted database files. Discovery File and Directory Discovery Discovery Network Share Discovery Discovery System Network Configuration Discovery Discovery Account Discovery: Domain Account Discovery Domain Trust Discovery Discovery Permission Groups Discovery: Domain Groups Discovery Remote System Discovery Lateral Movement Lateral Movement Lateral Movement Lateral Movement Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol Remote Services: SMB/Windows Admin Shares Remote Services: Windows Remote Management Remote Services: Distributed Component Object Model Collection Automated Collection Collection Data Staged: Remote Data Staging Collection Input Capture: Keylogging ----- Collection Archive Collected Data: Archive via Utility T1560.001 The actor was routinely observed archiving collected data via 7zip. Command and Control Command and Control Encrypted Channel T1573 ShadowPad configurations indicated Command and Control communications were sent via port 443. Proxy: Internal Proxy T1090.001 ShadowPad instances had a Proxy module installed. It was identified that a proxy module was installed and was interacting via port 445. Exfiltration Exfiltration Over C2 Channel T1041 ShadowPad has the capability to exfiltrate data. [1] [https://www.secureworks.com/research/shadowpad-malware-analysis](https://www.secureworks.com/research/shadowpad-malware-analysis) [2] [https://www.pwc.co.uk/issues/cyber-security-services/research/chasing-shadows.html](https://www.pwc.co.uk/issues/cyber-security-services/research/chasing-shadows.html) [3] [https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-29464](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-29464) -----